Lavalys Everest Memory Performance
Website: Lavalys
-
Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe
-
Asus CrossHair II
-
Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H
-
Foxconn A79A-S
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
MB/s (higher is better)
-
Read (MB/s)
-
Write (MB/s)
-
Copy (MB/s)
-
Asus CrossHair II
-
Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe
-
Foxconn A79A-S
-
Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H
Nanoseconds (lower is better)
Even though we set the memory speed identical to the other boards tested at 1,066MHz, 5-5-5-15-2tRFC-2T, the Foxconn is slightly slower in read and copy speeds and has a fractionally lower latency than the Asus 790FX with SB600 and Asus CrossHair II with Nvidia's nForce 780a SLI MCP. Neither is a huge difference in synthetic bandwidth scores, but it's something that can often pass itself down into real-world scenarios.
SiSoftware Sandra Lite XII.2008.SP2c (14.24)
Website: Sisoftware
-
Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe
-
Asus CrossHair II
-
Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H
-
Foxconn A79A-S
-
8870.2
-
8789.8
-
8634.5
-
8631.5
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
MB/s (higher is better)
-
Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe
-
Foxconn A79A-S
-
Asus CrossHair II
-
Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H
Nanoseconds (lower is better)
Sisoft Sandra is somewhat less forgiving and puts the Foxconn A79A-S at the bottom of the table, 200MB/s slower than the Asus 790FX with SB600. Its latency, on the other hand, is only slightly higher than that of the Asus, but above both the other boards with integrated graphics chipsets.
Want to comment? Please log in.